{"id":4598,"date":"2017-12-22T11:00:21","date_gmt":"2017-12-22T05:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/?p=4598"},"modified":"2022-01-24T14:22:17","modified_gmt":"2022-01-24T08:52:17","slug":"feature-or-bug-facebook-tideplus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/2017\/12\/22\/feature-or-bug-facebook-tideplus\/","title":{"rendered":"Feature Or Bug &#8211; Facebook &#038; Tideplus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Uber has been making targeted offers for a long time.<\/p>\n<p>As I highlighted in my post titled\u00a0<a title=\"Permanent Link to Mastering Targeted Offers \u2013 The Uber Way\" href=\"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/14\/mastering-targeted-offers-the-uber-way\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"bookmark noopener\" data-slimstat=\"5\">Mastering Targeted Offers \u2013 The Uber Way<\/a>, some people get an offer, others don&#8217;t. As a result, two cohorts of riders can see two different prices for the same ride.<\/p>\n<p>In the early days, the price difference was attributed to a bug. But, as customers learned that Uber makes targeted offers at the level of individual riders, they began to recognize the disparity for the feature that it really is.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/FEATURE-BUG-fi.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4616 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/FEATURE-BUG-fi.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"630\" height=\"280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/FEATURE-BUG-fi.jpg 630w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/FEATURE-BUG-fi-200x89.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As brands increasingly adopt personalization in their communications, what you see is not what I see.<\/p>\n<p>Then there are other types of differences like:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>What you see on desktop is not what you see on mobile<\/li>\n<li>What you see yesterday is not what you see today<\/li>\n<li>Inconsistencies in what you see wherever and whenever<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>At first blush, it might seem that the discrepancy is caused by a bug in brand websites, apps or messages. But, if we dig deep, we might start getting the feeling that the difference is created by a deliberate action taken by the brand i.e. feature.<\/p>\n<p>This post is about features that masquerade as bugs &#8211; or what I call <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em> events.<\/p>\n<hr style=\"width: 70%;\" \/>\n<p>Since\u00a0<em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em> is introduced by the brand owner &#8211; actively or passively &#8211; it&#8217;s likely to always favor the brand. As we&#8217;ll see shortly, benefits of <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>\u00a0to a brand include increase in engagement, reduction in cost, boost in sales, etc.<\/p>\n<p>When it comes to the consumer, there are three degrees of <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Favorable<\/li>\n<li>Neutral<\/li>\n<li>Unfavorable<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Consumers will probably like a first degree <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>. Therefore, it boosts customer loyalty.<\/p>\n<p>Consumers are indifferent to a second degree <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>. In the worst case, they may be somewhat ticked off by it. But it still won&#8217;t affect their engagement with the brand in the future. Accordingly, a second degree <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>\u00a0is neutral to customer loyalty.<\/p>\n<p>Consumers are antagonized by a third degree\u00a0<em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>. As a result, it adversely impacts customer loyalty.<\/p>\n<p>In this post, I&#8217;ll illustrate the three degrees of\u00a0<em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>\u00a0with one example of each.<\/p>\n<p><strong>#1. FACEBOOK CHECKIN &#8211; Favorable #FeatureOrBug<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I saw the following update on my Facebook Feed.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/fb-checkin-drink-breakfast.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4599\" src=\"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/fb-checkin-drink-breakfast.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/fb-checkin-drink-breakfast.jpg 412w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/fb-checkin-drink-breakfast-141x200.jpg 141w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>If you notice the text carefully, it reads &#8220;Vikesh Mehta was drinking having breakfast&#8230;&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Wot? <em>Drinking<\/em> breakfast?<\/p>\n<p>Tongue in cheek, I replied, &#8220;I&#8217;ve heard of &#8220;liquid lunch&#8221;. Now &#8220;liquid&#8221; has started from breakfast itself, eh?:)&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>My friend thought it was a bug, reasoning that FB had tagged the said eatery as a coffee shop, thus forcing the status to begin with &#8220;drinking&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I wasn&#8217;t so sure.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve seen many such Facebook updates in the past. I didn&#8217;t know they were called FB Checkin and I&#8217;ve never reacted to one before. Both of that changed after I read this update. By displaying it in the manner that it did on this occasion, Facebook created awareness and generated engagement for Checkin. Ergo, it was probably a feature rather than a bug. Since I was happy to learn about a new Facebook &#8220;product&#8221;, this <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em> was favorable to me.<\/p>\n<p><strong>#2. TIDEPLUS &#8211; Neutral #FeatureOrBug<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The leading detergent brand TIDEplus recently ran a promo. You had to locate a code on the product&#8217;s pouch and enter it on PayTM&#8217;s website to earn a cashback on your PayTM wallet.<\/p>\n<p>It was hard to find the code. But I located it finally on the inner surface of the detergent&#8217;s pouch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4600\" src=\"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE.jpg 1592w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE-100x100.jpg 100w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE-200x200.jpg 200w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-01-CODE-1024x1024.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I entered the code on PayTM&#8217;s website, only to be informed that the offer had already expired.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-04.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-4620\" src=\"http:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-04.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"261\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-04.jpg 411w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/PAYTM-TIDEPLUS-04-200x174.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I naturally felt shortchanged.<\/p>\n<p>I inferred one of the following two things from this exercise:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>TIDEplus expected to sell a certain number of products on offer (&#8220;offer packs&#8221;) during the offer period and shipped that quantity to the trade. But actual sales were lower than expected. As a result, many offer packs were still left on the shelves after the offer expired &#8211; one of which was the one I&#8217;d purchased. In an ideal world, a company would go back to the trade and recall all unsold offer packs. But, in the real world, I don&#8217;t know a single corporate paragon of virtue that does that and I don&#8217;t expect P&amp;G, the owner of TIDEplus, to be the exception.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>OR<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>TIDEplus deliberately dumped more offer packs than it expected to sell during the offer period, hoping to capitalize on the strong possibility that the offer would attract a lot of additional consumers out of which only a few would bother to redeem it and fewer still would complain when they found out that the offer had expired by then. This is a shady practice. Notwithstanding the number of brands who follow it &#8211; and there are many &#8211; this practice tarnishes the brand image.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/qr360_gtm360.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-4618 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/qr360_gtm360-133x200.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"133\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/qr360_gtm360-133x200.png 133w, https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/qr360_gtm360.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 133px) 100vw, 133px\" \/><\/a>Since I had no way of knowing which of the two things had really happened, I gave the benefit of doubt to the brand. While I&#8217;m now a little wary of TIDEplus, I&#8217;m not upset that badly that I&#8217;ll stop buying the product in future.<\/p>\n<p>On a side note, sophisticated CEM solutions are now available that help brands estimate in advance how much sales uplift they can get by running a certain customer engagement program. One of our customers has such a solution. Brand managers who need help in this space can feel free to\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gtm360.com\/Contact_Us.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>contact us<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<hr style=\"width: 70%;\" \/>\n<p>The next installment of this post will feature a third degree <em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em>.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/vijayshekhar?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@vijayshekhar<\/a> Why does PayTM use my wallet balance when I don&#39;t check Fast Forward? Taking my wallet w\/o permission is called pickpocketing.<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Ketharaman Swaminathan (@s_ketharaman) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/s_ketharaman\/status\/923930682480627713?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 27, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Spoiler Alert: Some\u00a0<em>#FeatureOrBug<\/em> shenanigans can turn a brand advocate to an ex-customer.<\/p>\n<p>Watch this space!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uber has been making targeted offers for a long time. As I highlighted in my post titled\u00a0Mastering Targeted Offers \u2013 The Uber Way, some people get an offer, others don&#8217;t. As a result, two cohorts of riders can see two different prices for the same ride. In the early days, the price difference was attributed &#8230; <a title=\"Feature Or Bug &#8211; Facebook &#038; Tideplus\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/2017\/12\/22\/feature-or-bug-facebook-tideplus\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Feature Or Bug &#8211; Facebook &#038; Tideplus\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":4616,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,14,13,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-b2-product-v-services","category-cx","category-product","category-mandatory-category"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4598"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9053,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4598\/revisions\/9053"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gtm360.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}